The raising question when somebody starts to trust the others is what makes him to trust them. The answer of this question can be generated on several considerations that become the people motives in giving trust to the others, include:
1. Because of the ownership of information. This depends on the degree of information and its relevancy in decision making whether it is credible or not. Thus, the degree of confidence can decreased or zero due to the lack of information. In this context, trust is interpreted as knowledge.
2. Because of the rational consideration in decision making that contains risks. As capital investment in the stock market has very high risk, to invest in this area, it is necessary to do the accurate and mature calculations in facing the chances of gains and losses.
Like the example in the trade, the seller delivers to the buyer installment that aims to gain traction and benefit buyers by giving confidence to buyers. Trust into the determination of profit or loss if misplaced confidence to buyers. And this proves what the parties are given the confidence can really be trusted or not.
Trust in Sociology Perspective
Trust in Sociology Perspective
There are three approaches to understand the meaning of trust.
1. Trust as part of self-identity, as well as a social system which can be explained by observing individual behavior and orientation, basically, the trust is self-identity and then evolved into a social system that unites other persons in a relationship, because the trust is basically psychological.
2. Trust is seen as a useful collective attribute for social fabrication. Trust is seen as a social resource that can be engineered to achieve certain goals of the organization.
3. Trust is understood as a form of social values in a society that nurtured by the actions of the community members themselves.
Based on the three approaches mentioned above, it can be concluded at the beginning, trust is no more than personal, psychological and particular norms.
The simple understanding of the trust is: “willingness to take a risk”. It is an interaction based on the sense of confidence, that others will respond as expected, and will support each other. Or, at least people have no mean to harm. So, there is safety feeling in the interaction. This feeling has a range of areas which is defined as: “the circle of people among whom cooperative norms are maintained and kept”.
Trust in Economic Perspective
K. Arrow (1975) states that essentially, every commercial transaction has a trust element. And this idea comes from Adam Smith that the people in the same trade can freely meet and the conversation among them usually ends up in a conspiracy to the public to create a high price.
The economic exchange provides an opportunity. For profit, the opportunistic actors will do anything, including providing wrong information to the other. To identify from whom the opportunity is obtained and from whom this opportunity cannot be obtained will need some cost. Therefore, the existence of the trust becomes the element of economic efficiency.
Trust: Social Capital and Economic Interaction
The trust between traders and suppliers is formed through the repeated re-interpretation of economic relation. Positive assessment of the both side had a positive impact on economic prospect for further cooperation.
Kinship is very effective means to build mutual trust. Other means is primordial ties, such as professional associations. Thus, the trust is able to be treated as capital that contains practical value in the economic action which is derived from sociology cultural mechanisms, such as religion, tradition and common environment.
Trust, Contract and Transaction Cost
Contract as a legal mechanism that regulates the cooperative relations is crucial in overcoming economic problems associated with the trust. Economists argue that this existence contract is made on basis of rational calculation and it has replaced the trust in economic cooperation relation, which affects the formation of cultural independent association.
Contract in legal and economic aspects, can glue the people who do not know each other is a partnership without any prior claim to believe. Trust is not able to replace the function and position of the contract as a legal institution. Contract will be more efficient with the trust, so it can minimize the transaction costs, claims and complaints through government regulations in case of contract cancellation which caused by other factors, such as skulduggery.
The example of trust in our daily life
No comments:
Post a Comment